The IDM in brief
At its heart
the IDM is very simple. When asked in workshops what influences decision making, people identify a wide sweep of factors which
inevitably fall into the broad categories of values, theories, evidence, and the environment (ranging from the physical to
the political). These categories, including practice itself, correspond to the IDM domains and subdomains:
¨ the domain of
underpinnings includes the subdomains of values/goals/ethics,
theories/beliefs, and evidence; our
underpinnings are our “foundations,” which influence us even when we are not consciously aware of how we define
or prioritize them
¨ the domain of
understanding of the environment includes the subdomains of vision, analysis of health-related issues, and analysis of work/organization-related issues; our environments range from the organizations
we work in to the international arena and include a variety of socio-economic and political systems and structures, and psychological
and physical conditions
¨ the domain of
practice includes the subdomains of responding
to health-related issues, responding to work/organization-related issues, and
research (including evaluation); practice is composed of processes, activities
and strategies
As can be seen
in the diagram of the IDM on the next page, the domains and subdomains exist in the context of the broader environment. The
domains and subdomains are interactive, that is, each influences and is influenced by the others.
|
According to
the IDM, our practices will be “best” if they are consistent with and reflect health promotion underpinnings and
understanding of the environment.
|
The IDM Framework in brief
The challenge
facing practitioners is, first, to identify and define our health promotion underpinnings and understanding of the environment,
and, second, to apply these to our practice. This is where the IDM Framework comes in.
The IDM Framework,
the practical application of the IDM, is a multi-purpose “change” tool for practitioners and organizations in
any situation who want to pursue a best practices approach to health promotion. Using a health promotion filter to ensure
that practice is consistent with health promotion underpinnings and understanding of the environment, the IDM Framework can
help to:
¨ increase understanding
of health promotion, and build capacities and supports
¨ make decisions
and policies
¨ increase communication
and “team build”
¨ plan, implement,
evaluate, and revise programs/activities that are sensitive to local conditions
¨ “make
the case” for programs/activities
¨ achieve health
promotion goals
The Framework
leads us through a process where, from a health promotion perspective (that is, keeping in mind health promotion values and
all the other subdomains), we answer the following questions about our activities and programs:
¨ where are we
now and where do we want to go?
¨ how do we get
to where we want to go?
¨ what did we
do, how did we do it, and what were the results?
¨ what do we need
to change in order to move forward?
¨ what criteria
and guiding principles will help us in our journey?
It does this
through a series of steps, which are meant to be used “organically” rather than linearly, that is, according to
the demands of our particular situation and how we work best rather than in a set order.
The IDM Framework (© Kahan & Goodstadt, 2001 & 2003)
|
|
Step
1: Prepare Foundation for Action re. selected issue |
Step
2: Make Action & Evaluation Plan
[How do we get to where we want to go?
Who does what, when & how?] |
Step 3: Document Implementation of Plan |
Step
4: Revise |
|
|
health promotion
criteria & guiding principles |
current
situation
[where are we now?] |
picture
of ideal situation
[where do we want to go?] |
specific
objectives to achieve ideal |
resources
|
challenges
|
evaluation
plan
|
activities
& processes
[what did we do? How did we
do it?] |
outcomes
of activities & processes
[what were the results?] |
revisions
[what do we
need to change?] |
|
UNDERPINNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beliefs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNDERSTANDING OF ENVIRONMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HP analysis of health/environment issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HP analysis of organization/
environment issues |
|
|
|
|