|
Current issue
|
Current response
|
Current response
|
Identifying “ideal” response in real world
|
Bridging gap between current and “ideal” response
|
Action plan to move current response closer to “ideal” response
|
|
Identifying & describing current response
(i.e., strategies, activities, processes)
|
Identifying “gaps” in current response
|
|
Socio-ecological analyses
[May use Intervention Mapping Approach and/or “problem tree” analysis”]
|
Socio-ecological analysis of health-related issue
|
Socio-ecological analysis of current response
|
The variety of strategies and activities employed in the response, and how these relate to the SDOH at the various levels associated with taking an socio-ecological approach in responding to your selected issue
|
Identifying gaps between socio-ecological understanding of (1) the issue versus (2) the response—this will identify strengths & weaknesses
|
Optimizing correspondence between socio-ecological analyses of issue & response—within the constraints of the “real” world of HP practice
|
Proposed “bridging” of gap between socio-ecological understanding the issue & the actual response
|
1. Objectives & indicators of success
2. Tasks/activities to achieve objectives
3. Timelines
4. Resources
5. Challenges
6. Evaluation
OR
1. Who?
2. What ?
3. How?
4. When?
5. With what resources?
6. With what intended effects?
|
|
Underlying foundations of health promotion practice
|
|
Analysis of foundations of current response:
· Values
· Theory/beliefs
· Evidence
|
|
Identifying gaps between stated/assumed foundations & values, theory, and evidence in the actual response
|
General HP principles that should guide all interventions/responses
1. re. values, theory, evidence
2. re. interventions (e.g., multiple synergistic strategies at multiple levels--see Bartholomew et al.)
3. re. addressing the social determinants of health
|
Proposed “bridging” of gap between HP beat practices “ideals” and the current response
|
